Learn the difference between true randomness and pseudorandom generation, and why pseudorandomness is fine for almost everything.
Software “randomness” is almost never truly random in the strictest physical sense, and that’s completely fine for the overwhelming majority of everyday uses, understanding the distinction just helps set the right expectations.
True randomness comes from an unpredictable physical process, like radioactive decay or atmospheric noise. Most software instead uses pseudorandom number generation: a deterministic algorithm, seeded with some starting value, that produces a sequence of numbers statistically indistinguishable from true randomness for practical purposes, without actually being unpredictable to someone who knows the algorithm and seed.
For games, simulations, sampling, and general everyday randomization, a good pseudorandom generator is entirely sufficient, its output passes every practical statistical test for randomness. Only in specific security-critical contexts (generating encryption keys, for example) does the distinction between pseudorandom and cryptographically secure random generation actually matter.
The Random Number Generator generates random numbers instantly within any range you specify.
Random Number Generator
Usually not in the strictest sense. Most software uses pseudorandom generation, a deterministic algorithm that produces output statistically indistinguishable from true randomness for practical purposes.
For the vast majority of everyday uses, no. It only matters in specific security-critical contexts, like generating encryption keys, where a cryptographically secure random source is specifically required.
Yes, absolutely. Randomness doesn’t guarantee variety between individual results, repeats are a normal, expected part of genuine randomness.
A starting value that determines the entire sequence a pseudorandom generator will produce; the same seed will always produce the same sequence of “random” numbers.
Because true randomness naturally produces clumps and streaks over short sequences; an artificially “even” distribution over a small sample would actually be a sign of non-randomness, not evidence of it.
Find the right tool, or keep reading Brekzy's other guides.